Calling For Chief Justice’s Intervention… Lawyers’ Society Slams Sentence on Zainab Sheriff As “Unjustifiably Excessive”
The Lawyers’ Society has strongly criticized the conviction and sentencing of Zainab Sheriff, describing the four-year, two-month prison term as “unjustifiably excessive” and a violation of fundamental human rights.
In a press release, the Society expressed deep concern over the ruling delivered by Magistrate Brima Jah in the case involving the Inspector General of Police. The legal body argued that Sheriff’s comments, made in the exercise of her right to freedom of expression, should not have resulted in criminal prosecution.
The Society highlighted that the Political Parties Regulation Commission (PPRC) had already imposed a fine over the matter—one that was paid by the opposition party—raising questions about the necessity and legality of further judicial action.
It also took issue with the court’s refusal to grant bail throughout the summary trial, noting that this decision contradicts both the presumption of innocence and provisions in the new Criminal Procedure Act of 2024.
According to the Lawyers’ Society, the severity of the sentence risks undermining democratic principles by discouraging citizens from expressing dissenting or unpopular opinions. The group warned that such actions could signal shrinking tolerance for open dialogue and free speech in Sierra Leone.
In light of these concerns, the Society has urged the Chief Justice to exercise his summary review powers under existing laws to revisit the case, acquit, and discharge Sheriff—pointing to precedent in similar cases involving unfair sentencing.
Reaffirming its commitment to the rule of law and good governance, the Lawyers’ Society 1stressed the importance of safeguarding constitutional rights as a cornerstone of democracy.
