As Parliament Commences Probe Into NEW… Has the Hunter Become The Hunted?
By JKM
Sierra Leone’s Parliament has taken a decisive step to probe the operations of National Elections Watch (NEW), amid growing concerns over transparency and accountability.
The motion, tabled during Tuesday’s parliamentary sitting, mandates a comprehensive investigation into NEW’s activities, particularly its management of donor funds and its role in election monitoring. Lawmakers say the move aims to safeguard democratic integrity and reinforce public confidence in electoral oversight institutions.
This action follows a formal complaint by the National Consortium on Public Accountability, which raised concerns over alleged financial irregularities and fund management within NEW. Parliament, through the Speaker, confirmed that the matter will be referred to the relevant committee for detailed examination, including hearings, evidence collection, and submission of findings within a stipulated timeframe.
Observers believe the probe could have far-reaching implications for civil society engagement in governance, particularly in election monitoring, where credibility is essential.
Moreover, Honourable Sellu strongly defended Parliament’s decision, emphasizing that the move is not meant to punish NEW, but to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. He cited a March 26 press release, highlighting that information circulating on social media—or claims presented as Parliamentary positions—are misleading and could damage reputations and public trust.
Sellu stressed that Parliament’s intervention is designed to protect both individuals and institutions. By inviting NEW to appear before the relevant committee, a proper and impartial investigation can be conducted, with findings made public to clear any doubts and preserve credibility.
He described the action as constructive and supportive, commending Parliament for taking proactive steps to safeguard institutional integrity rather than allowing speculation to persist. Hon. Sellu emphasized that the core issue is financial accountability and transparency—not politics or electoral competition—and connects directly to ensuring civil society organizations operate responsibly, especially those receiving public or donor funds.
He further pointed out that, according to NEW’s own press release, the organization has 487 members, with 442 actively participating—representing 88.3 percent engagement. Membership lists are publicly displayed and verified, grievances addressed, and documentation exists across all operational levels, from local branches to district, regional, and national structures.
Honourable Sellu concluded that these issues warrant parliamentary review, urging NEW leadership to provide clarity. This process, he maintained, will ultimately reinforce public confidence and demonstrate that civil society institutions operate with transparency and responsibility.
The connection between Sellu’s submission and his remarks underscores Parliament’s dual aim: to safeguard institutional credibility while ensuring NEW meets the highest standards of accountability.